Naked Funny Best of Volume 1

,
Open Preview

See a Problem?

We'd love your help. Let us know what's wrong with this preview of The Naked Jape by Jimmy Carr.

Thanks for telling us about the problem.

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

 · 916 ratings  · 67 reviews
Start your review of The Naked Jape: Uncovering The Hidden World Of Jokes
Manny
Oct 14, 2010 rated it really liked it
This is a fun book! A professional comic and his friend, who seems to be some kind of academic type, collaborate to write a treatise on the nature of humour. They've done a good job, and there is at least one joke on every page - a really varied assortment too, ranging from traditional staples (What's brown and sticky?) to sophisticated meta-jokes. Some of the ones I liked most are in my updates.

You can read it for the jokes alone, but I thought the discussion was at least as worthwhile. They lo

This is a fun book! A professional comic and his friend, who seems to be some kind of academic type, collaborate to write a treatise on the nature of humour. They've done a good job, and there is at least one joke on every page - a really varied assortment too, ranging from traditional staples (What's brown and sticky?) to sophisticated meta-jokes. Some of the ones I liked most are in my updates.

You can read it for the jokes alone, but I thought the discussion was at least as worthwhile. They look at the subject from many different angles, and go through a bunch of theories about how humour works. One thing they notice is that the arguments any given person presents in favour of a theory seem to say more about them than they do about the theory itself. Their star example is the sexually obsessed Professor Legman (his real name), whose Freudian theory of jokes was based on the hypothesis that they are always about sex. Evidently, sex often features in jokes, but to say they're always about sex does seem to take it way too far. It's a good warning though.

Here are some more of the theories they describe. Perhaps the most popular one comes from that well-known prankster, Immanuel Kant. Kant thought that the essence of the joke is incongruity: you see things one way, then you suddenly flip over to seeing them a different way. Carr and Greaves agree with Kant that this is important, but they point out that incongruity isn't enough on its own: in particular, timing is essential too. All the same, they think that jokes usually involve incongruity in some form.

Another mainstream theory, going back at least as far as Aristotle, is that jokes are about demonstrating superiority. You laugh at people to show that you're better or smarter or something like that. Certainly, Polish jokes and blonde jokes seem to fit the bill - not to mention what's arguably the greatest joke of all time, slipping on a banana-skin and falling flat on your ass. Again, though, it's easy to find jokes where no one is obviously being insulted or degraded.

Yet another theory: jokes are about exercising power. You gain power over people by making them laugh. Servile employees stereotypically laugh at their boss's jokes (they quote studies demonstrating that this really happens). Also, as Woody Allen points out, laughter is a weapon of seduction, so jokes give you sexual power too. Interestingly, they point out that it's mostly in the male-to-female direction. For some reason, men want to make women laugh, but aren't generally as keen on having women make them laugh. One wonders why not.

They look at it from other perspectives as well. Some animals may have a sense of humour: perhaps Aristotle was wrong when he said that man is the animal that laughs. They talk about the cultural roots of humour, in legends of trickster gods (amazing how widespread they are), who are almost always aggressively male, with huge penises. Well, let's face it: even if humour isn't all about sex, penises are funny. And there's a good deal about different kinds of jokes, and about what it's like to be a standup comedian. I'm afraid I was a little disappointed to hear how heavily scripted standup is. I'd thought it was more spontaneous than it turns out to be. There's a nice chapter on the subversive element inherent in jokes.

At the end of the day, they remind us that humour is a strange and wonderful thing. We all know what it is from our own experience, but no one can explain it! It's not for nothing that Raymond Smullyan drew an analogy between humour and mysticism in Planet Without Laughter . And Wittgenstein said that humour isn't a feeling, but a way of looking at the world. As usual for Wittgenstein, a simple but at the same time very deep observation.

Well, as I said, it's fun. Check it out for yourself - it's a quick read! And if you're still wondering what's brown and sticky, the answer is a stick.
______________________________________________

So here's a theory that attempts to tie together several of the observations made in this book. As the authors say, humour must be useful in some way, but how? I wonder if it could be part of the mechanism that forces people to adapt to the societal norms around them. If you see someone who's not quite fitting the accepted social pattern, they seem incongruous. Maybe they speak in an odd way, or they are unaware of some of the complex social norms that make up the fabric of society. That incongruity is funny, so we laugh at them. But being laughed at doesn't feel nice. The people who are behaving oddly experience a pressure to conform, and that pressure is created by other people's sense of humour.

It sounds rather horrible, but if we didn't experience pressure to imitate other people's behaviour with great exactness then society wouldn't be possible. In particular, language wouldn't be possible. Everyone these days agrees that language isn't taught in the school-room; it's acquired from the people around you. And, from the abstract point of view, what I like about my hypothesis is that it combines the "incongruity" and "superiority" theories, and possibly also the "power" theory. Once you have enough power to make the people around laugh at the things that you consider funny, you can exert pressure on other people due to their fear of ridicule.

What do you think? Note that if you start laughing hysterically and pointing your finger at my absurd review, I'll be less inclined to argue for it. If you mock it offensively enough, I may even withdraw it. But if you instead make fun of the weird, dumb people who don't like it, I'll start thinking I may have stumbled on something good.
______________________________________________

I wrote to Matthew Hurley, one of the authors of Inside Jokes , to ask him what he thought of my theory. Apparently it was suggested by the French philosopher Henri Bergson in 1911. Damn. As usual, nothing new under the sun.

...more
Tom
Mar 01, 2013 rated it liked it
Absorbing, funny and surprisingly well written. This is not a shameless celebrity cash-in, this is apparently something which the two authors cared about and wanted to do properly.

They manage the tricky balancing act of fitting plenty of laughs in the text while also taking the subject seriously and giving the reader a really informative and fascinating discussion. Their investigation into every aspect of jokology takes in Elegba the trickster god, The Wise Men of Gotham, the ancient Roman idio

Absorbing, funny and surprisingly well written. This is not a shameless celebrity cash-in, this is apparently something which the two authors cared about and wanted to do properly.

They manage the tricky balancing act of fitting plenty of laughs in the text while also taking the subject seriously and giving the reader a really informative and fascinating discussion. Their investigation into every aspect of jokology takes in Elegba the trickster god, The Wise Men of Gotham, the ancient Roman idiot trade, children saying "poo!", Eskimo drumming contests, Aristotle, Freud, Dario Fo, Stalin and Bernard Manning. Plus there's a really good selection of gags between chapters and at the foot of every page.

The discussion on offensive jokes is particularly interesting for anyone who's seen Jimmy Carr perform. I'm sure his analysis of the issue is far from the last word on the subject and there are holes that could be picked in his argument but it does show that he's certainly being thoughtful about it rather than just finding justifications for what he does.

Overall, I'm glad I read this. I've got a couple more jokes in my repertoire and, as I bought it in a charity shop, I didn't even have to contribute to Jimmy the tax-dodger's dodgy finances. Result.

...more
John G.
The best book I've ever read about humor and laughing, from one of my favorite comics too. Very deep and serious examination of humor, its history, its functions, its value. Great, great jokes too! The best book I've ever read about humor and laughing, from one of my favorite comics too. Very deep and serious examination of humor, its history, its functions, its value. Great, great jokes too! ...more
Steve Mitchell
Jul 25, 2011 rated it really liked it
Although there is a joke at the foot of every page and a dozen between chapters, this is not a particularly funny book. This is a genuine attempt to locate the place that the joke and laughter occupy in the human psyche. As the quote from E. B. White says at the start of chapter five; "Analysing humour is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested, and the frog dies."
This is a genuinely well thought out treatise into the nature of humour and well worth a look provided you realise that aro
Although there is a joke at the foot of every page and a dozen between chapters, this is not a particularly funny book. This is a genuine attempt to locate the place that the joke and laughter occupy in the human psyche. As the quote from E. B. White says at the start of chapter five; "Analysing humour is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested, and the frog dies."
This is a genuinely well thought out treatise into the nature of humour and well worth a look provided you realise that around about a fifth of the book is filled with actual jokes – and some belters are in there – and the other four-fifths is a psychological breakdown of such topics as; why do we laugh? What purpose do jokes serve? Should any subject be a taboo for humour? And is it really the way you tell them?
Just be prepared that this is more about the science of the joke – more specifically, psychology and the place of humour in the human nature – than a joke book.
...more
Edmole
Mar 12, 2012 rated it really liked it
I considered covering this up when I read it outside, as Jimmy Carr is one of those comedians who make ironic or ambiguous offensive jokes, then quite happily accept ticket money from people who wouldn't know irony or ambiguity if they hit themselves in the face with them.

Al Murray, he's the worst one for it. And he has such kind eyes.

Anyway, having said that, I like Jimmy, and his jokes make me laugh SO PERHAPS THE JOKE IS ON ME. This book is a very good exploration of all the different aspects

I considered covering this up when I read it outside, as Jimmy Carr is one of those comedians who make ironic or ambiguous offensive jokes, then quite happily accept ticket money from people who wouldn't know irony or ambiguity if they hit themselves in the face with them.

Al Murray, he's the worst one for it. And he has such kind eyes.

Anyway, having said that, I like Jimmy, and his jokes make me laugh SO PERHAPS THE JOKE IS ON ME. This book is a very good exploration of all the different aspects of humour, with a broad scope and an even hand. It has lots of good gags in it as well at the start of each chapter. My favourite jokes are the ones about the Jews and the Queers.

Last night on Room 101 Micky Flanagan said he wanted to put celebrity chefs in Room 101, 'because there's so many of them nowadays, and they've all got their 'thing' that they do.' Not like comedians, eh Micky?

Ed

...more
Erikka
This was fantastic. I'm a huge fan of Jimmy Carr, so I was expecting an informative book with a humorous and engaging narrator. I was not disappointed. (Kudos to Lucy Greeves as well for her part in the writing--don't want to leave her out, because they co-wrote this so flawlessly that I don't know who wrote what). I enjoyed the scattered jokes, the observations on the role humor plays in our lives, and the stories about the effects humor has had on specific people throughout history.

To save an

This was fantastic. I'm a huge fan of Jimmy Carr, so I was expecting an informative book with a humorous and engaging narrator. I was not disappointed. (Kudos to Lucy Greeves as well for her part in the writing--don't want to leave her out, because they co-wrote this so flawlessly that I don't know who wrote what). I enjoyed the scattered jokes, the observations on the role humor plays in our lives, and the stories about the effects humor has had on specific people throughout history.

To save anyone else the issue I had in finding this book here in the states, it's the book the British humorously call "The Naked Jape." Same book, new title, slightly changed for our tender 'Murcan sensibilities. Hopefully this will now show up in Google searches to help other travelers in the world of comedy and humor research (anyone who reads this book will wish there were more travelers like us. It's such a great topic!).

...more
Mdaly
Mar 03, 2017 rated it it was ok
Amusing read but no great insight into comedy. Surprised by the amount of toilet humour and 'Carry-On'-style innuendo in a book with pretensions to be a bit more thoughtful. What came across clearly from the authors was that there are still taboos in comedy for modern comedians, the taboos now are anything that contest the brainless liberal ideology that underpins their own thinking.
The research quoted was just confirmation bias to give the appearance of depth to a book that studiously avoided a
Amusing read but no great insight into comedy. Surprised by the amount of toilet humour and 'Carry-On'-style innuendo in a book with pretensions to be a bit more thoughtful. What came across clearly from the authors was that there are still taboos in comedy for modern comedians, the taboos now are anything that contest the brainless liberal ideology that underpins their own thinking.
The research quoted was just confirmation bias to give the appearance of depth to a book that studiously avoided any great insight or investigation into the darker side of comedy and what it might reveal about the human condition.

Can't really complain though, I got in a charity shop for a euro!

...more
Darrin Woods
Jan 30, 2013 rated it it was amazing
It's got Jimmy Carr in, which makes it aces already. I am very impressed with the balance of scholarly study and a relaxed tone in this volume. If you want to read a book about jokes, not just of jokes, then I would suggest this one. It's got Jimmy Carr in, which makes it aces already. I am very impressed with the balance of scholarly study and a relaxed tone in this volume. If you want to read a book about jokes, not just of jokes, then I would suggest this one. ...more
Josephine Myles
Not only a really interesting dissection of how jokes and humour in general work, but it's a joke book too. I laughed out loud many times while reading! You don't even have to like Jimmy Carr to enjoy the book ;) Not only a really interesting dissection of how jokes and humour in general work, but it's a joke book too. I laughed out loud many times while reading! You don't even have to like Jimmy Carr to enjoy the book ;) ...more
Jan
Fascinating book about the history of jokes, why we laugh, etc. and it contains a lot of jokes that are great fun. A wonderful summer read.
Rebecca
Feb 23, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Brilliant. Funny, informative, a great non-fiction read (and I don't say that very often). Brilliant. Funny, informative, a great non-fiction read (and I don't say that very often). ...more
Penni
Dec 28, 2014 rated it liked it
Surprisingly scholarly and incredibly boring. Read it strictly for the jokes and skip 90% of the theories and rhetoric.
Ven Benables
Mar 23, 2017 rated it really liked it
I found this in a charity shop so my cash went to Barnado's rather than some offshore tax haven. Surprisingly absorbing and well researched book. I found this in a charity shop so my cash went to Barnado's rather than some offshore tax haven. Surprisingly absorbing and well researched book. ...more
Will
Jun 05, 2011 rated it did not like it
I bought and read this believing it to be a 'how to get more humor in your delivery book'. It isn't.

In this tome, Carr and his co-author repeat the same turgid point chapter after chapter, "Jokes are funny. People like them. If you deconstruct them they loose what makes them funny. "

But deconstruct is precisely what Carr and Comrade try to do. Without much success! They do succeed in making the same points over and over and over, though. Yawn.

Carr includes a few examples of studies done on hum

I bought and read this believing it to be a 'how to get more humor in your delivery book'. It isn't.

In this tome, Carr and his co-author repeat the same turgid point chapter after chapter, "Jokes are funny. People like them. If you deconstruct them they loose what makes them funny. "

But deconstruct is precisely what Carr and Comrade try to do. Without much success! They do succeed in making the same points over and over and over, though. Yawn.

Carr includes a few examples of studies done on humor and the oldest known joke which in an etymology sense I suppose is kind of interesting. The end of each chapter is also filled with a few jokes relative to that chapter's content. There are a few hits there, but mostly misses.

I am a great fan of Carr, I don't think he's an idiot at all or an unlikable person. He's simply got a very funny persona which he plays up to on stage and has genuine wit, writing things which are seriously amusing instead of relying on surrealism and stupidity which seem to be all the rage in British Comedy nowadays.

So Carr can certainly pen a joke, which begs the question: why isn't this book funny? Unless you paid RRP for it in which case the joke is certainly on you. I strongly suspect that Carr has had a marginal involvement in the creative process here, and it's made suspiciously unclear what his contributions were.

The book itself attempts to chart a history of a subject which in it's inherent word of mouth nature defies charting. This isn't to say it's badly written, it's certainly very readable - I finished it within a few days.

Overall, if you wish to be mildly entertained and have a limited collection of Christmas cracker style gags and you see it in 'The Works' or similar, be my guest.

If you're looking for something educational or informative, look elsewhere though. Better books on being funny have been written. Unless you like reading the same point being made over and over again. And just for you guys..."Jokes are funny. People like them. If you deconstruct them they loose what makes them funny. "

...more
Richard Ings
A somewhat interesting exploration of the origins of humour, though mainly flimsy and anecdotal. Still, there was an interesting insight into the nature of the offensive joke - that it is possible that as long as we are laughing at people (even if it is hurtful) we at least recognise their humanity; it is only when we dehumanise them that jokes become irrelevant. With this in mind, it is still largely dominated by a snobbish 'you can't joke about that' mentality when it comes to comedians such a A somewhat interesting exploration of the origins of humour, though mainly flimsy and anecdotal. Still, there was an interesting insight into the nature of the offensive joke - that it is possible that as long as we are laughing at people (even if it is hurtful) we at least recognise their humanity; it is only when we dehumanise them that jokes become irrelevant. With this in mind, it is still largely dominated by a snobbish 'you can't joke about that' mentality when it comes to comedians such as Bernard Manning, who are seen (of course) as inciting the rabble to hate others. Fortunately, for all that, it does serve as a repository for some very good one-liners, and since the old-fashioned 'joke book' no longer really exists, it has value for being a limited compendium of some of the best ones from a fairly recent stock of comedians (including Carr himself of course). ...more
Stefanie
Oct 13, 2011 rated it it was amazing
If you know what you are looking for, this book can GIVE YOU EVERYTHING. Okay, that was an exaggeration, but this book is fantastic IF you are looking for a book ABOUT jokes and humor, the history, the politics, the culture of joking. It is a sort of anthropology. THIS IS NOT A JOKE BOOK. There are jokes on every page (straight forward, lining the bottom of the pages, I mean) and in between each chapter. But the text is a brilliant survey of the joke taken from different perspectives: myths, off If you know what you are looking for, this book can GIVE YOU EVERYTHING. Okay, that was an exaggeration, but this book is fantastic IF you are looking for a book ABOUT jokes and humor, the history, the politics, the culture of joking. It is a sort of anthropology. THIS IS NOT A JOKE BOOK. There are jokes on every page (straight forward, lining the bottom of the pages, I mean) and in between each chapter. But the text is a brilliant survey of the joke taken from different perspectives: myths, offensiveness, ethnicity, religion, being a standup, etc. Plus there's mention of Stewart Lee. So all is right in the world.

Comedy nerds rejoice.

I will now be copying down all of the more academic titles from the further reading section!

...more
Spiros
Feb 07, 2013 added it
Recommends it for: those who want an answer to the question "Are you havin' a laugh?"
Man walks into a bar...
I got about three-fourths through this book, which was quite fairly enjoyable and mildly thought provoking, when I took it into a regular Friday night Chinatown haunt, and, due to some sadly predictable stupidity between the drunken owner and a douchebag patron, decided that I wanted to be elsewhere. It didn't seem worthwhile wading back into the shitstorm (the cops had everything under control) to retrieve it, so I guess I'll never know how it turns out. I'm sure it'll be
Man walks into a bar...
I got about three-fourths through this book, which was quite fairly enjoyable and mildly thought provoking, when I took it into a regular Friday night Chinatown haunt, and, due to some sadly predictable stupidity between the drunken owner and a douchebag patron, decided that I wanted to be elsewhere. It didn't seem worthwhile wading back into the shitstorm (the cops had everything under control) to retrieve it, so I guess I'll never know how it turns out. I'm sure it'll be tossed out before I'm back next Friday.
It's fun seeing Jimmy Carr, who likes to portray himself as an ignorant smart-ass on British panel shows, show a more scholarly side. Periodically, I could hear his extraordinary laugh in some of the passages.
...more
Oliver
Aug 25, 2008 rated it really liked it
Like most people you probably think Jimmy Carr is a bit of a cock. That occasionally funny bloke who lives on comedy pannel shows and those shows about the 50 most blah blah blah movies/show/events that seem to fill up the Saturday night TV schedule whilst sucking the life out of you. Actual his stand-up material is quite good if a bit formulaic.
Well along with Lucy Greeves (ok she probably did most of the work) he has gone and written a rather brilliant book about comedy. There's also a joke an
Like most people you probably think Jimmy Carr is a bit of a cock. That occasionally funny bloke who lives on comedy pannel shows and those shows about the 50 most blah blah blah movies/show/events that seem to fill up the Saturday night TV schedule whilst sucking the life out of you. Actual his stand-up material is quite good if a bit formulaic.
Well along with Lucy Greeves (ok she probably did most of the work) he has gone and written a rather brilliant book about comedy. There's also a joke an every page if like me you have the attention span of a gnat. Not such a cock after all it seems...
...more
Frederic
Jimmy Carr is a British comic who doesn't do bits, chunks or long form observations. He writes and performs jokes and has thought a lot about that process. This book explores what makes us laugh and traces the sociology and history of jokes. At the bottom of every page is a joke, some unattributed, some by Carr and many by others. Carr and co author Greeves met at Cambridge and their prose is informed and entertaining. Highly recommended. This book was published in the UK as "The Naked Jape." Th Jimmy Carr is a British comic who doesn't do bits, chunks or long form observations. He writes and performs jokes and has thought a lot about that process. This book explores what makes us laugh and traces the sociology and history of jokes. At the bottom of every page is a joke, some unattributed, some by Carr and many by others. Carr and co author Greeves met at Cambridge and their prose is informed and entertaining. Highly recommended. This book was published in the UK as "The Naked Jape." The version I read is called, "Only joking: What's so funny about making people laugh?" ...more
Alex
Aug 09, 2017 rated it liked it
Recommended to Alex by: alexanderbleachwriter@gmail.com
Definitely a good history of jokes and joking. Many glaring omissions fails to acknowledge many of the UK 70s comedians who paved the way for alternative comedians as a reaction; instead we get the typical "Bernard Manning was racist". Too many quotes from Jimmy Carr's jokes, we know he co-wrote the book, but in places it feels more like a vanity project than an attempt to cover the history of jokes. The book also drifts into feeling a lot like somebody's university media studies thesis and neve Definitely a good history of jokes and joking. Many glaring omissions fails to acknowledge many of the UK 70s comedians who paved the way for alternative comedians as a reaction; instead we get the typical "Bernard Manning was racist". Too many quotes from Jimmy Carr's jokes, we know he co-wrote the book, but in places it feels more like a vanity project than an attempt to cover the history of jokes. The book also drifts into feeling a lot like somebody's university media studies thesis and never quite gets the tone right, between accessible and academic. ...more
Red
It's been a few years since I read it, but the more I think about it, the more I believe this is the best non-fiction book I've ever read, leaving a more lasting impression on me, as a person, than any other. It's been a few years since I read it, but the more I think about it, the more I believe this is the best non-fiction book I've ever read, leaving a more lasting impression on me, as a person, than any other. ...more
Ray Savarda
The text is rather not funny, giving an wide-ranging analysis of jokes and history, etc. Many of the "bottom-of-the-page" (one on most every page!) jokes are pretty funny, and the section of longer jokes before every chapter holds many funny ones also.
Overall, a decent read.
The text is rather not funny, giving an wide-ranging analysis of jokes and history, etc. Many of the "bottom-of-the-page" (one on most every page!) jokes are pretty funny, and the section of longer jokes before every chapter holds many funny ones also.
Overall, a decent read.
...more
Jasmine
Nov 30, 2014 rated it did not like it
I only read the first two chapters of this book. I doubt I will finish reading it; at least not in the new future. I found that it was just repeating the same point over and over, and not even then jokes at the ends of chapters were making it worthwhile.
Rachel
This is a good overview of the research and theory behind humor. The authors try a little too hard to be funny themselves; sometimes I would rather read it in a straightforward tone. It's fun and interesting, though, very well-researched, and a good gateway to other resources in the field. This is a good overview of the research and theory behind humor. The authors try a little too hard to be funny themselves; sometimes I would rather read it in a straightforward tone. It's fun and interesting, though, very well-researched, and a good gateway to other resources in the field. ...more
David Raffin
An interesting book on the subject of jokes.
Compiled by the comedian Jimmy Carr ("Throwing acid is wrong. In some people's eyes.")
An interesting book on the subject of jokes.
Compiled by the comedian Jimmy Carr ("Throwing acid is wrong. In some people's eyes.")
...more
Farhat Baig
nice attempt to explain why we like jokes. interspersed with one liners throughout (one per page)
Ellen Evers
Nice overview. On one hand it's great that the authors tried to be scientific, on the other hand, they did not manage to distinguish between good research and weird speculation. Nice overview. On one hand it's great that the authors tried to be scientific, on the other hand, they did not manage to distinguish between good research and weird speculation. ...more
Castiron
Plenty of entertaining jokes, plus interesting observations on humor.
Lauren
Feb 16, 2014 rated it really liked it
This book is a funny look at jokes that works well. They explore joking in our society, history, what it's for, how humour is useful, theories of humour, offense, and every other part of joking. This book is a funny look at jokes that works well. They explore joking in our society, history, what it's for, how humour is useful, theories of humour, offense, and every other part of joking. ...more
Rich B
Jun 12, 2022 rated it it was amazing
Read this when it first came out and remember enjoying it a lot. Needed some light relief from some other less fun books I'd been reading, so decided to re-read it.

Very glad I did because it's still a great read. Full of humour unsurprisingly, but clearly and intelligently written with a real warmth and affection for the subject. Even though it's now 15+ years old, the only thing that really dates it are the names of some of the comedians proving the jokes.

But the themes it covers, from the or

Read this when it first came out and remember enjoying it a lot. Needed some light relief from some other less fun books I'd been reading, so decided to re-read it.

Very glad I did because it's still a great read. Full of humour unsurprisingly, but clearly and intelligently written with a real warmth and affection for the subject. Even though it's now 15+ years old, the only thing that really dates it are the names of some of the comedians proving the jokes.

But the themes it covers, from the origins and history of jokes and humour all the way through to its impact on modern culture still feel very valid to this day. It's such a human and universal topic, one we start to learn in childhood and take all the way through to old age. The references the authors pull in keep it consistently interesting and funny.

Though not really a joke book as such, there are loads of jokes in it too. One at the bottom of each page, plus a selection at the end of each chapter. Not all of them made me laugh, as everyone's sense of humour is different, but it did remind me of jokes I'd long forgotten that are still funny.

My favourite was "what did Freud say is the difference between fear and sex? Funf". Clever on so many levels. Though obviously less funny if you don't know how to count in German.

Outside the jokes, the writing is clear and engaging, with plenty of evidence, quotes, anecdotes and stories to bring to life what a life-enhancing part humour can play in our lives.

It may not be everyone's cup of tea (you do need to like British humour to really appreciate it, as it's quite self-deprecating at times), but it worked for me and I really enjoyed this.

Highly recommend (and not just for all the jokes).

...more
James Anthony Patrick "Jimmy" Carr (born 15 September 1972) is an English comedian and humourist, known for his deadpan delivery, dark humour, and use of edgy one-liners. He is also a writer, actor and presenter of radio and television. Carr moved to a career in comedy in 2000 and has become a successful British comedian. After becoming established as a stand-up comedian, Carr began to appear in a James Anthony Patrick "Jimmy" Carr (born 15 September 1972) is an English comedian and humourist, known for his deadpan delivery, dark humour, and use of edgy one-liners. He is also a writer, actor and presenter of radio and television. Carr moved to a career in comedy in 2000 and has become a successful British comedian. After becoming established as a stand-up comedian, Carr began to appear in a number of Channel 4 television shows, most notably as the host of the panel show 8 out of 10 Cats. ...more

News & Interviews

A good scary story is an oddly appealing experience. There's something about the subtle chills of the ghost story—or the cathartic thrills of...
"People say, "Now you've given up booze at least you can remember what you did last night." I say, "Yeah, nothing." —Frank Skinner" — 1 likes
"Actually, seriousness is not incompatible with joking. It's a common mistake to confuse 'serious' with 'solemn', and to assume that seriousness of purpose can only be conveyed by solemnity of tone." — 1 likes
More quotes…

Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.

Login animation

moorefiresom1983.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2355155.The_Naked_Jape

0 Response to "Naked Funny Best of Volume 1"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel